Tri-College Library
Collection Management Policy
Author: Thomas
Bremer
Purpose
Philosophy
Selection Guidelines
De-selection Guidelines
Definitions
Levels of Collecting
at the Three Libraries
Purpose
The Tri-College University is a consortium consisting
of Concordia College, Moorhead State University, and
North Dakota State University. Its purpose is to provide
a broader range of programs, more extensive facilities, and a greater
depth of resources for the students and faculties of the three institutions
than would otherwise be available. The purpose of this policy is
to serve as a guide to cooperation in collection management for
the three institution libraries.
Philosophy
TCU Librarians recognize that cooperation in
collection management will tend to result in an interdependence
of the individual collections. However, in response to the dual
economic realities of increasing materials costs and tightening
budgets; in accord with accrediting agencies' recognition of "accessibility"
as a factor in collection building; and in accord with the continuing
viability of the Tri-College University Consortium, the libraries
agree to implement this program under the following provisions:
- A. The implementation of this policy affirms
the philosophy that supports collection management of the general
collection with a view toward unified strength rather than three
single, balanced & duplicated collections.
- B. Cooperation shall be implemented through
the TCUL Acquisitions Task Force, who are delegated the primary
responsibility for collection management.
- C. Task Force decisions shall be guided by
the following considerations:
- The curriculum and user needs of the individual
institutions.
- The selection and acquisition policies of
the individual libraries.
- The existing identified strengths of the individual
library collections.
- The cost of, demand for, and accessibility
to an individual item.
- D. Within these guidelines, TCU Libraries
may:
- Compare selections to be purchased for the
purpose of reducing unnecessary duplication.
- Combine existing holdings of items (such as
incomplete sets).
- Jointly purchase specific items.
- E. This Tri-College Library Management
Policy shall be reviewed as needed by the TCU Acquisitions
Task Force. This review shall take into consideration the
curricular growth and development at each of the Tri-College University
institutions.
Selection Guidelines
The three libraries have collections which
are similar in many respects although with strengths and specialized
collections which differ both in depth and breadth. The development
of these collections is determined primarily by the curricula of
the three institutions, the degrees offered, and the research requirements
of the faculty. To avoid fragmentation, maintain strength, and to
develop depth and breadth in the areas of specialization appropriate
to each library, these guidelines are offered.
- A. Each of the three libraries has assumed
the responsibility for developing an in-depth collection in certain
subject areas. Broadly stated these are:
- NDSU--the sciences and technology, architecture;
- MSU--education, business, music, law;
- Concordia--religion, philosophy, classics,
Jewish studies, East Africa studies.
- B. Materials should be selected keeping in
mind that we are building a broad basic collection which we feel
is a necessity for any quality academic library. This material
may be of a general nature including basic sources in each field,
materials at an undergraduate level, materials which cross departmental
lines, and standard and definitive works.
- C. Materials may be duplicated in areas of
study taught on all of the campuses, chiefly in most of the liberal
arts. However, since the strength of the programs varies from
campus to campus, each librarian attempts to correlate the intensity
of collecting with the strength of the programs, bearing in mind
the amount of material published in each area.
- D. In general, limit to one copy the purchase
of items specified for upper undergraduate, graduate, or professional
levels as indicated by selectors from Choice or other reviewing
tools.
- E. Discontinue purchase of all out-of-print
materials except in situations justified for special purposes.
- F. Purchase foreign language materials only
for the study of languages except in situations justified for
special purposes.
- G. Purchase the least expensive format when
there is a choice.
- H. Eliminate unwanted duplication of major
sets such as complete works, letters, variorum editions, papers,
annual reviews, progress in, methods in, etc. For ongoing publications,
the library owning the most volumes will be responsible for maintaining
the work and the addition of future volumes.
- I. Emphasize selecting materials from critical
reviews or examination of materials, recognizing that other sources
may at times be used.
De-selection
Guidelines
To avoid fragmentation of sets of materials,
maintain strength and quality of collections, and develop depth
and breadth in the areas of specialization appropriate to each library,
attention must be given not only to selection, but also to withdrawal,
transfer, and use of these collections. Each library must have an
ongoing plan for withdrawing obsolete materials, transferring portions
of sets of books to the library with the greatest need or the most
complete set, and removing to storage areas those materials which
continue to have value but which are infrequently used.
- A. When individual collections are weeded,
broken sets should be checked against Tri-College Library holdings
and scattered volumes should be offered to the library with the
most complete set.
- B. Items weeded from a consortium library
which might be of interest to another member library specializing
in that area should be checked against that library's holdings,
and if appropriate, offered to that library.
- C. Items which are weeding candidates in any of
the libraries should be checked against the Tri-College holdings
and if the item is the last available copy in the Tri-College
Libraries, this fact should be considered in the weeding decision.
Definitions
for Levels of Collection Density and Collection Intensity
The need for library materials varies in the
different subject areas. Current and projected degree and research
programs determine the level of acquisitions to be attempted in
order to meet the needs of these programs.
"The terms defined below are designed for use
in identifying both the extent of existing collections in given
subject fields (collection density) and the extent of current collecting
activity in the field (collection intensity).
- A. Comprehensive level.
- A collection in which a library endeavors, so far
as is reasonably possible, to include all significant works of
recorded knowledge (publications, manuscripts, other forms) in
all applicable languages, for a necessarily defined and limited
field. This level of collecting intensity is that which maintains
a "special collection"; the aim, if not the achievement, is exhaustiveness.
- B. Research level.
- A collection which includes the major source materials
required for dissertations and independent research, including
materials containing research reporting, new findings, scientific
experimental results, and other information useful to researchers.
It also includes all important reference works and a wide selection
of specialized monographs, as well as a very extensive collection
of journals and major indexing and abstracting services in the
field.
- C. Study level
- 1. Advanced study level. A collection which
is adequate to support the course work of advanced undergraduate
and master’s degree programs, or sustained independent study,
that is, which is adequate to maintain knowledge of a subject
required for limited or generalized purposes, of less than research
intensity. It includes a wide range of basic monographs both current
and retrospective, complete collections of the works of more important
writers, selections from the works of secondary writers, a selection
of representative journals, and the reference tools and fundamental
bibliographical apparatus pertaining to the subject.
- 2. Initial study level. A collection which
is adequate to support undergraduate courses. It includes a judicious
selection from currently published basic monographs (as are represented
by Choice selections) supported by seminal retrospective
monographs (as are represented by Books for College Libraries),
a broad selection of works of more important writers, a selection
of the most significant works of secondary writers, a selection
of the major review journals, and current editions of the most
significant reference tools and bibliographies pertaining to the
subject.1
- D. Basic level.
- A highly selective collection which serves to introduce
and define the subject and to indicate the varieties of information
available elsewhere. It includes major dictionaries and encyclopedias,
selected editions of important works, historical surveys, important
bibliographies, and a few major periodicals in the field.
- E. Minimal level.
- A subject area which is out of scope for the Library’s
collection and in which few selections are made beyond very basic
reference tools.
The definitions are proposed to describe a range
of diversity of titles and forms of material; they do not address
the question of availability of multiple copies of the same title.2
Levels
of Collecting at the Three Libraries
Footnotes:
1. American Library
Association. Collection Development Committee. Guidelines for
Collection Development. David L. Perkins, Editor. Chicago: A.L.A.,
c1979, p.4.
2. American Library
Association. Resources and Technical Services Division. Resources
Section. Collection Development Committee. "Guidelines for the formulation
of collection development policies." Library Resources and Technical
Services, 21:42-3, Winter, 1977.
Go Back to the Top
|
Last Updated: March 11, 2008